• Origination

Heading IconClario - AI Agent for Medical Coding v1.1

Heading Icon
5/5
Heading Icon

The clinical note is exceptionally detailed and well-organized, covering all essential sections including Patient Information, Chief Complaint, HPI, PMH, ROS, Physical Examination, Assessment/Diagnosis, and Plan/Treatment. Each section contains the specific details needed for precise medical coding, billing, and claims processing. The note clearly documents symptoms, duration, severity, medication instructions, follow-up plans, and safety assessments which are crucial for determining codes and billing procedures.


Heading IconQueries

1

The provided notes only contain formatting markers ('-_-_-_-') and instructions regarding coding for wounds and E&M services. To assign accurate CPT codes for each treated wound and possibly an E&M code, could you please provide additional clinical details? Specifically, we need information about the number of wounds treated, the procedures performed on each wound (including measurements if applicable), and whether any evaluation and management office visit was conducted during this encounter. This clarification will help us determine if a procedure code is applicable for each wound (or none if no treatment was documented), and if an E&M code should be added (e.g., CPT 99213 or similar) based on the visit details. The clarification is required to ensure proper coding according to the guidelines [Procedure Code: Wound Treatment; E&M: Office Visit].

2

Could you please confirm the final signed documentation, including the printed name and date for the clinician’s signature section? (This is important for ensuring legal compliance and proper audit trail for codes such as 99204 for a new patient psychiatric evaluation.)

3

Can you clarify if any formal evaluations or standardized assessments (beyond the ASRS screening noted) are planned or have been ordered for the provisional ADHD diagnosis? (This helps in assigning appropriate codes like 314.00 for ADHD evaluation if needed.)

Heading IconPrimary Diagnosis

  • 95% Confidence

F41.1 ICD-10-CM i

The primary complaint is the patient’s overwhelming anxiety, worry, and functional impairment impacting his work and personal life, which aligns with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (F41.1). This was explicitly documented in the Assessment as the chief issue for the visit.

Heading IconOther Diagnosis

  • 90% Confidence

G89.29 ICD-10-CM i

Chronic pain related to degenerative disc disease and musculoskeletal discomfort is documented in the patient’s history and noted to contribute to overall impairment. G89.29, which denotes other chronic pain, is chosen to reflect this condition.

  • 90% Confidence

F90.9 ICD-10-CM i

The provisional diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder is noted due to inattention, time management issues, and hyperactivity symptoms in the context of the patient’s functional impairment. F90.9 is used as it represents ADHD, unspecified.

  • 95% Confidence

G47.33 ICD-10-CM i

Sleep-related concerns are addressed under obstructive sleep apnea, as mentioned in both the PMH and the assessment. G47.33 is specific for obstructive sleep apnea in adults.

Heading IconProcedures

  • 95% Confidence

90791 CPT i

A comprehensive new patient psychiatric evaluation was performed, which matches CPT code 90791. This code is specifically used for psychiatric diagnostic evaluations without associated medical services.

  • Performed By Psychiatrist/Clinician
  • Modifier Value
  • Performed On Date of Visit
  • Units Or Days 1
  • Schedule Unknown
  • Reason New patient evaluation

Payer Rules IconPayer Rules Evaluation

Procedure code 90791, a psychiatric diagnostic evaluation, was paired with diagnosis codes for generalized anxiety disorder (F41.1), ADHD (F90.9), sleep apnea (G47.33), and chronic pain (G89.29). However, the payer’s coverage rules described pertain exclusively to endovenous ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for symptomatic lower‐extremity CVI/varicose veins. The required clinical criteria (symptoms such as limb aching, skin changes, etc.), imaging criteria, CEAP classification, and documentation of conservative therapy are not relevant to a psychiatric evaluation. There is no mapping within the payer rules linking 90791 to any of the covered venous treatment criteria. In addition, required documentation and prior authorization conditions stated in the venous treatment guidelines are not provided. As a result, this procedure and diagnosis pairing does not comply with the payer’s specific coverage rules.